Brexit: Call for Belgian authorities to address multiple status for M-card holders

As part of our pro bono support to “Brexit and the Belgian Brits” (BABBs) community group, we have addressed a formal request to the Belgian authorities – as well as the European Commission – to draw attention to a serious but fixable administrative gap affecting British citizens living in Belgium.

The context: rights that should last a lifetime

Under the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement, British citizens who were already lawfully resident in Belgium before 31 December 2020 retain a comprehensive set of rights, including the right to live and work in Belgium, the right to equal treatment, family reunification rights, and the right to return after periods of absence. These are not temporary concessions – they are permanent, Treaty-level protections.

The Belgian M card is the document that currently attests to this status. For most holders, it works perfectly well. The problem arises when the M card holder’s life moves on, such as when they acquire Belgian nationality or when they obtain a second, complementary immigration status, such as EU long-term residence status or residence as the family member of an EU citizen.

Acquiring Belgian citizenship or an additional residence status should not erase the very rights the Withdrawal Agreement was designed to protect.

The problems we have identified

1. Belgium does not allow holding two residence cards simultaneously

When a beneficiary of the Withdrawal Agreement qualifies for and obtains an additional immigration status (for example, an “F card” as the family member of an EU citizen, or an “L card” as a long-term resident), the Belgian authorities currently require them to surrender their “M card”. However, the European Commission has explicitly confirmed in its guidance that holding multiple immigration statuses also entails the possibility of holding multiple residence documents. Belgian practice is therefore out of step with EU law on this point.

2. British citizens who acquire Belgian nationality must give up their M card

Belgian law treats a person who acquires Belgian nationality as, first and foremost, Belgian. This is uncontroversial. What is problematic is that, once they hand in their M card, there is currently no failsafe mechanism on the Belgian population register to record that this person also holds Withdrawal Agreement beneficiary status. The Court of Justice of the EU confirmed in its Lounes judgment (Case C-165/16) that acquiring the nationality of a host state does not extinguish EU free movement rights. The same principle applies to citizens’ rights under the Withdrawal Agreement and yet the Belgian system currently provides no secure and long-lasting way to record or demonstrate this.

3. The Population Register has no clear codes confirming the Status of Withdrawal Agreement beneficiarY

The M card is currently the only document that proves Withdrawal Agreement beneficiary status in dealings with federal, regional, and municipal authorities. The Belgian national register‘s existing information type system (so-called IT/TI codes) does not include a specific code that records whether a person holds permanent or temporary residence rights under the Withdrawal Agreement, independently of their current nationality or any additional immigration status. Once the M card is gone, that proof often disappears with it.

Why does this matter in practice? Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries have specific rights that sometimes differ from general EU law rights. The most notable is the right to return to Belgium even after an absence of up to five years. A British beneficiary of the Withdrawal Agreement who has attained permanent residence in Belgium who then obtains a long-term residence permit in Belgium that enables them to move to France might find it practically impossible to return to Belgium and resume their residence there.
The same applies to family reunification rights under the Agreement, which are more favourable in many respects than those under Belgian immigration law. Someone who has become Belgian but retains their British nationality may face serious difficulties invoking their right under the Withdrawal Agreement if there is no record of their previous beneficiary status.

The solutions we have proposed

Rather than simply raising the problem, our letter sets out concrete, technically feasible proposals that can work within Belgium’s existing population register infrastructure. These require no change to legislation and no new systems need to be built. The solutions require updated instructions and targeted additions to existing coding frameworks.

Solution 1 — Recording dual nationality without restriction

The Belgian Population Register already has a code for dual nationality (IT/TI code 032). However, its current instructions limit its use to persons who voluntarily acquire an additional nationality on top of Belgian nationality and only from 2008 onwards. We propose that this code be applied universally: for anyone who holds Belgian nationality alongside another nationality, regardless of when or how either was acquired. This would allow British-Belgian dual nationals to have both their nationalities properly recorded, making their status visible to Belgian authorities at all levels.

Solution 2 — A dedicated register code for Withdrawal Agreement status

The Register already allows the recording of special information about non-Belgian nationals (IT/TI code 202). We propose the creation of a new sub-category — code 5.3.0 — specifically for British nationals who are Withdrawal Agreement beneficiaries. This new heading would carry four sub-codes distinguishing between temporary and permanent residence rights, and between principal beneficiaries and family members. With this in place, a person’s Withdrawal Agreement status would be permanently recorded on the register, surviving any change of nationality or the acquisition of a different residence status.


What this means for British citizens in Belgium

If you are a British national living in Belgium and you are considering applying for Belgian nationality, or you believe you may qualify for EU long-term resident status or another immigration status, you should be aware of these issues before you take action. Surrendering your M card without a proper record of your Withdrawal Agreement status being preserved elsewhere may result in practical difficulties in proving your rights to Belgian authorities in the future.

We are actively engaging with the Belgian authorities on this and will publish any developments on this page. We believe the proposed solutions are straightforward to implement and we are cautiously optimistic that the authorities will act on them.

In the meantime, if you are considering a change to your residence status or applying for Belgian nationality, we would be happy to advise you on the implications that your plans may have on your current and what action you can take to safeguard your status even without these technical changes taking place.

Please free to get in touch

We regularly advise British citizens on their rights under the Withdrawal Agreement, as well as providing advice to all residents of Belgium on acquiring Belgian nationality. If you have questions about how these issues might affect you personally, please feel free to get in touch.

Get in touch

This article is for general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Published May 2026.

Conditions for getting Belgian nationality to be tightened further: a closer look at what’s coming down the road

When it took up office earlier this year, the government of Bart De Wever announced a raft of measures to tighten the rules for getting Belgian nationality.

The first of these changes has seen a seven-fold hike in the federal application fee from €150 to €1000.  While the increase is substantial, this is still significantly less than the €5000 application fee which the current Minister of Defence Theo Francken had previously proposed (see further private Members’ bill proposal No 56 0246/001). Note that the fee is indexed meaning that it will increase every year in line with rises in the cost of living.

However, this is not the only change being contemplated to the Belgian Nationality Code. Further changes have also been announced as regards the substantive conditions which applicants have to meet when applying for Belgian nationality by declaration.

At present, under the rules contained in the Belgian Nationality Code, a person may apply for Belgian nationality after living in Belgium for a continuous period of five years provided that they prove their economic participation, social integration and knowledge of one of the national languages (at A2 level).  

Alternatively, a person may apply for Belgian nationality after living in Belgium for a continuous period of ten years if they can prove social integration or economic participation, as well as knowledge of one of the national languages.

Further options also exist for those born in Belgium, those married to a Belgian and those who reach retirement age or are unable to work due to disability.

When it took office, the government of Bart De Wever announced that it wanted to “set higher expectations and standards” as regards the acquisition of Belgian nationality.

A series of proposed changes to the Belgian Nationality Code were accordingly announced in the coalition agreement for 2025-2029.

As at today’s date, no government bill has been laid before the Belgian Parliament – although various proposals were introduced by parliamentarians in 2024 that call for similar changes to the law.

What do we know about the proposed changes? The following changes are likely to be enacted:

  • Anyone wishing to obtain Belgian nationality will now have to take a nationality exam consisting of a citizenship test and a language test in all cases. This would be in addition to the social integration requirement. The contents of this nationality exam would need to be defined at a later stage in an agreement between the linguistic communities.
  • The language test will need to be made in the language used in the region in which the person resides. As a result, it will no longer be possible to demonstrate meeting the language requirement by having completed a French language course when living in Flanders.
  • In addition, it will no longer be possible to automatically qualify for the language requirement through five years of continuous employment, nor by having attended an integration course.
  • Belgian nationality will be foreclosed to anyone who poses a threat to public order or national security. Anyone who has an uncontested tax debt will also lose the opportunity to obtain Belgian nationality.

We do not yet know when these changes will be proposed nor when they are likely to take effect. Nonetheless, we should expect these changes to be enacted during the course of this current government (2025-2029).

What we do know is that it’s soon going to be more difficult to apply for Belgian nationality .

In the event you are likely to be affected by these proposed changes to Belgian nationality, please feel free to contact us for further assistance.

Brexit: Call for Belgian authorities to respect appeals rights under Withdrawal Agreement

How the Belgian Immigration Office is harming NATO’s cybersecurity capabilities

Today, our firm is calling on the Belgian authorities to respect the Withdrawal Agreement and put an end to the practice of the Immigration Office to withdraw temporary protection to British citizens who are in the process of appealing a refusal to grant them a right of residence in Belgium.

Under the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement British citizens who bring an appeal against a refusal to award them a residence permit are allowed to continue living in the country concerned until a final judgment has been handed down.

Article 18(3) of the Withdrawal Agreement could not be more crystal-clear: “pending a final judgment handed down in case of judicial redress sought against any rejection of such application by the competent administrative authorities, all rights provided for in this Part shall be deemed to apply to the applicant”, which include the right to remain and work until the appeal is finally concluded.

Despite this clear obligation, the Belgian authorities have nonetheless been withdrawing the temporary residence document (so-called annexe 35 / bijlage 35) which had been issued to British citizens when they first brought an appeal, in circumstances where their first-level appeal is refused by the Immigration Appeals Council and they subsequently bring a second-level appeal before the Council of State, the Belgian supreme administrative court.

When our firm challenged the Belgian Immigration Office over this, we were informed that, as a matter of Belgian law, appeals to the Council of State do not have any suspensive effect. While this may be correct as a matter of Belgian law, we have pointed that the Withdrawal Agreement explicitly provides otherwise and that this overrides any contrary provision of national law in accordance with the principle of supremacy of EU law.

Our view is fully supported by the European Commission’s guidance note on citizens’ rights under the Withdrawal Agreement (para. 2.6.16) and its FAQs on the rights of UK nationals under the Withdrawal Agreement (Qs 6.4, 7.9 and 7.18).

The Belgian Immigration Office has so far refused to accept this view, saying that their obligation is to provide a first-level right of appeal but nothing further, and that as a consequence their obligation to provide for the suspensive effect of appeals under the Withdrawal Agreement has been extinguished with the dismissal of the first-level appeal.

Given that this practice is predominantly affecting British contractors supporting NATO’s communications agency, this is having a significant detrimental impact on the day-to-day operations of NATO’s IT infrastructure and cybersecurity. These actions also pose a risk to the financial viability of scores of British businesses which act as subcontractors under framework contracts concluded by that agency.

The Belgian authorities must step up and honour their commitments under the Withdrawal Agreement.  What is needed right now, as a short-term fix, is for the Belgian Immigration Office to halt issuing instructions for the cancellation of temporary authorisations (annex 35) and re-instate those which have been cancelled. As a longer-term solution, legislation needs to be tabled to address these gaps in procedural safeguards contained in the Belgian decree on immigration.

Our firm has therefore today addressed letters to the Belgian and British authorities asking for this situation to be resolved as a matter of urgency.

If you are affected by any of these matters, please feel free to contact our firm in full confidence.

Brexit: ‘M card’ now qualifies as proof of legal residence for Belgian nationality

Following our successful lobbying efforts on behalf of “Brexit and the Belgian Brits”, a royal decree was adopted on 30 August 2021 and published today by the Belgian Minister of Justice which ensures that the “M card” is now explicitly included among the list of residence documents which qualify for the acquisition of Belgian nationality by declaration.

Following the change of rules, which will enter into force on 11 September 2021, the “M card” will now feature among the list of residence documents which qualify for the purposes proving lawful residence when applying for Belgian nationality by declaration.

The “M card” is the special residence document which is issued to British citizens who qualify as beneficiaries of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement. All British citizens who wish to retain a right of residence in Belgium must apply for an “M card” before 31 December 2021.

In addition to the M card – both with and without a permanent residence endorsement – the list of qualifying residence documents will also include Annex 56 which is a temporary residence document issued to applicants pending the issue of their M card.

Our firm provided legal advice to “Brexit and the Belgian Brits”.

In the event you are affected by a refusal of the Belgian authorities to grant you Belgian nationality on the basis that you have held an M card or a special identity card or if you have been refused an M card, please feel free to contact us for further assistance.

Source: Arrêté royal du 30 août 2021 modifiant l’arrêté royal du 14 janvier 2013 portant exécution de la loi du 4 décembre 2012 modifiant le Code de la nationalité belge afin de rendre l’acquisition de la nationalité belge neutre du point de vue de l’immigration,  MB 01/09/2021 p. 93770 / Koninklijk besluit van 30 augustus 2021 tot wijziging van het koninklijk besluit van 14 januari 2013 tot uitvoering van de wet van 4 december 2012 tot wijziging van het Wetboek van de Belgische nationaliteit teneinde het verkrijgen van de Belgische nationaliteit migratieneutraal te maken, BS 01/09/2021 p. 93770

Surviving Brexit in Belgium: what should you do if you have had your M card refused?

Our firm has started to receive several reports from different sources of British citizens who have been refused an M card despite having arrived in Belgium before 31 December 2020.

An M card is the residence card issued to British citizens and their family members to prove they are beneficiaries of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement.

So what should you do if your application has been refused?

The first thing to do is not to panic. You are not going to be arrested by the police and deported on a flight back to the UK. You still have a bit of time to re-apply and fix your residence status before the end of the year.

However, you should not be complacent. The worst course of action would be to ignore the decision to refuse your application for an M card. You must instead take action straight away.  This is because from 1st January 2022, it will effectively become compulsory for all British citizens to hold the M card in Belgium. Those without an M card after that date are at risk of being found irregularly present in Belgium and liable to removal from Belgium.

A second immediate issue to consider is whether to appeal. There may be several reasons to do so, including the fact that lodging an appeal effectively prevents the Belgian authorities from being able to take any enforcement against you. This becomes particularly important as we approach the end of the application period for M cards on 31 December 2021.

In order to appeal, you will need to lodge proceedings before the Council for Alien Law Litigation within 30 days (30 days – not one month) of having been notified of the decision to refuse to issue you an M card. It is really important to get legal advice as the procedure is highly formalistic and litigants-in-person can easily be caught out by the procedure. Once the 30-day deadline has passed it is no longer possible to appeal.

In most cases your best course of action will be to submit a fresh application. Therefore a final matter to consider is what to do when you re-apply for an M card. It will be important to ensure that new documentation is provided in any new application to prevent a second refusal.  For example, it may be that the decision identified a problem with proving your presence in Belgium before 31 December 2021 and therefore any new application would need to provide documentary evidence to address this lack of evidence.

In conclusion, if you are refused an M card, do not worry, you should in most cases be able to resolve the situation. However, in order to minimise the chances of receiving another refusal, you should ideally get legal assistance.

In the event you are affected by a refusal of the Belgian authorities to issue you with an M card, please feel free to contact us for further assistance.

Brexit: Minister of Justice urged to ensure the ‘M card’ qualifies for Belgian nationality

In a letter submitted by “Brexit and the Belgian Brits”, the Belgian Minister of Justice has been formally requested to include the “M card” among the list of residence documents which qualify for the acquisition of Belgian nationality by declaration.

The “M card” is the special residence document which is issued to British citizens who qualify as beneficiaries of the Brexit Withdrawal Agreement. All British citizens who wish to retain a right of residence in Belgium must apply for an “M card” before 31 December 2021.

At present, the “M card” does not feature among the list of residence documents which qualify for the purposes of proving lawful residence when applying for the acquisition of Belgian nationality by declaration.

As a result, this prevents British citizens from being able to prove their right of lawful residence when applying for Belgian nationality by declaration under Article 12bis of the Belgian Nationality Code.

This in sharp contrast to the situation of EU citizens and their family members who can apply on the basis of E, E+, F or F+ cards and even using special identity cards, following our firm’s successful involvement in cases before the Belgian Supreme Court (Hof van Cassatie / Cour de Cassation).

This is likely to constitute unlawful discrimination contrary to the Belgian Constitution.

Our firm provided legal advice to “Brexit and the Belgian Brits”.

In the event you are affected by a refusal of the Belgian authorities to grant you Belgian nationality on the basis that you have held an M card, please feel free to contact us for further assistance.

Justice at last for holders of special identity cards applying for Belgian nationality

In a judgment that will undoubtedly be welcomed by many, the Belgian Supreme Court (Hof van Cassatie / Cour de Cassation) has ruled that a special identity card can constitute proof of lawful residence for the purposes of EU citizens applying for Belgian nationality by declaration (art. 12bis WBN / art. 12bis CNB).

The judgment relates to persons who had been refused Belgian citizenship on the sole basis that they held a special identity card, which according to the Belgian authorities did not prove lawful residence in Belgium.   Our firm has been representing the appellants before the Belgian authorities since the initial application was lodged at municipal level – for further background see our previous post here.

The Court held that the Court of Appeal was wrong in deciding that an applicant for Belgian nationality by declaration should not be considered lawfully resident in Belgium simply because they held a special identity card, which can be used as proof of the exercise of free movement rights which flows directly from EU law.

The Court did not rule on the other grounds of appeal relating to discrimination.

While the case will now go back to a Court of Appeal for a final decision, the ruling has immediate repercussions. All those with a pending appeal should make new submissions to the lower court drawing attention to this ruling and its implications.

Anyone who has been refused in the past should ideally reapply on the basis of holding a special identity card. However, as is always the case, it is advisable to get a lawyer to advise even at the commune level to draw attention to the judgment and its effects. 

In the event you are affected by a refusal of the Belgian authorities to grant you Belgian nationality on the basis that you have held a special identity card, please feel free to contact us for further assistance.

Crunch time for special ID cards in Belgian nationality cases?

Today the Belgian Supreme Court (Hof van Cassatie / Cour de Cassation) will be hearing three cases on the issue of the refusal by the Belgian authorities to consider that a special identity card can constitute proof of lawful residence for the purposes of applying for Belgian nationality by declaration (art. 12bis WBN / art.12bis CNB).

The cases relate to three persons born in Belgium who have been refused Belgian citizenship on the sole basis that they held a special identity card, which according to the Belgian authorities does not prove lawful residence in Belgium. Our firm has been representing the individuals concerned before the Belgian authorities.

While the lower court initially ruled in our clients’ favour, the case was appealed by the Procureur’s office. The court of appeal then ruled in favour of the Procureur and dismissed all arguments alleging discrimination under Belgian law and breach of EU law. The requests to refer the matter to the Belgian Constitutional Court and to the EU Court of Justice were refused.

A further appeal was brought before the Belgian Supreme Court against these judgments of the court of appeal. The legal basis for the appeal is discrimination contrary to Articles 10 and 11 of the Belgian Constitution and breach of the rules on preliminary rulings to the Belgian Constitutional Court.

In the event the appeal is successful before Belgian Supreme Court, this will not however be the end of the matter, as the case is then expected to be sent back to the appeal court and be referred to the Constitutional Court to determine whether there is any discrimination…

However, it will mean taking one further step towards achieving final closure on this issue.

In the event you are affected by a refusal of the Belgian authorities to grant you Belgian nationality on the basis that you have held a special identity card, please feel free to contact us for further assistance.

Call for evidence – Belgian special ID card – EU nationals denied Belgian citizenship

Have you been denied Belgian citizenship because you hold a special ID card?

If so, we would like to hear from you! We are currently collating evidence in support of an official complaint to the EU institutions to advocate for formal infringement proceedings to be initiated against Belgium.

Any information you provide will be used purely for statistical and analytical purposes. No personal information will be shared and your identity will remain confidential.

Please send an email to Valcke & Associates at evidence@valckelaw.com

Fake emails claiming to be from our law firm

Beware of fraudsters claiming to be from our law firm!

*updated August 2021*

We have been alerted that emails are circulating which fraudulently claim to be from our law firm proposing some investment scheme.

If you receive such a fake message, you should not respond, mark this as spam and delete it from your inbox.

Also there is no-one by the name of “Miss Abigail” working at our firm.

This is an example of the fraudulent email currently circulating:

———- Forwarded message ———
From: Anthony Valcke <a_avalcke@outlook.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 9, 2020, 14:52
Subject:
To: [your email]
 
I am  Anthony Valcke.(Attorney). I got your name and contact information in my quest for his existing extended family, I am writing you on highly confidential grounds with mutual benefit in respect to the investment of my client Mr [fake name that will match your surname].
 
I’d appreciate it if you get back to me by confirming to me if this medium is safe and confidential enough to enable me divulge to you details on why I contacted you. contact : 
 
 
Thank you for your anticipated cooperation. I expect to hear from you asap.
 
Regards,
 
Anthony Valcke  (Valcke & Associates)
+32-460245759
 
Some further examples of fake emails circulating falsely claiming to be from our firm:
 
Name: JefferySnita | Jefferypaide | Jefferyskams | JefferyskamsGM
Telephone: +86442585492 | +89978232856
E-Mail: [deleted]
Assunto: Invest once and get passive income up to $76000 per week

 

Message: Good earnings up to $5500 per day https://www.google.com/url?q=https://vk.cc/c0MfHu&sa=D&Ga=Bo&usg=AFQjCNGjI650_cZ0Wc55vy2kRrU6kWbrAQ

Name: Dennismog
Daytime Phone: 83723495217
Evening Phone: 81564234342
EMail: [deleted]
Country: Costa Rica
Comments: Ihr Einkommen 6000 EURO in funf Tagen. Registrieren Sie sich schneller, wenn Sitzplatze vorhanden sind >>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fvk.cc%2Fc19oJ5&sa=D&Ni=Hw&usg=AFQjCNE1hCglSk67TImhpV5aXDA5sbTaog
 
Name:Dennisgax
Phone:82465623527
E-Mail: [deleted]
Comments: Ihr Einkommen 6000 EURO in funf Tagen. Registrieren Sie sich schneller, wenn Sitzplatze vorhanden sind >>>>>>>>>> https://www.google.com/url?q=https%3A%2F%2Fvk.cc%2Fc19oJ5&sa=D&Ni=Hw&usg=AFQjCNE1hCglSk67TImhpV5aXDA5sbTaog